Card #c1503IR // #c1503Synthesis
He is moreover ineffable, and to be comprehended by mind alone, as has been stated; since he is neither genus nor species, nor difference ; nor has there happened to him any thing either evil—for it is not lawful to state this ; or good—for he would be such according to the participation of something, especially goodness; nor difference—for this (cannot be) according to the notion of him; nor being with equality—for he has not been made a quality, nor perfected by quality; nor without quality—for he has not been deprived of any quality, coming upon him; nor a part of any thing ; nor as a whole, possessing any parts; nor so as to be any thing the same or different—for nothing has happened to him, according to which he is able to be separated from the rest of things; nor does he move, nor is he moved. Now (the) first notion of him will be that, which is according to the abstraction from (all) these things ; as we have had a notion of a point according to an abstraction from what is perceptible by a sense, by thinking upon a superficies, then a line, and lastly a point. The second notion will be that, which is according to analogy... But the third notion would be something of this kind. A person, after contemplating the beauty in bodies, will then proceed to the beauty of the soul... after which he will think of the good itself, and the lovely, and desirable, as it were a light that has appeared, and is shining out upon the thus ascending soul.
— Alcinous, *Handbook*, Ch. 10, trans. George Burges (1854) **Surface Gloss:** The Primary God is beyond all logical categories—neither genus, species, part, whole, qualified, nor unqualified. Because humans are clogged by sensory images, we reach a notion of him by three paths: geometrical-style Abstraction, proportional Analogy, and step-by-step Ascent to sudden illumination. *(Note: Burges's "equality" is a printer's slip for "quality," as confirmed by the next clause.)*
When trying to communicate or grasp a radically novel, foundational concept that breaks existing categories, stop trying to give a standard dictionary definition (which traps it inside old boxes). Instead, triangulate it using the **Threefold Apophatic Protocol**:
1. **Strip (*Via Negativa*):** Explicitly list the familiar pairs of opposites it is *not* ("neither X nor the opposite of X").
2. **Map (*Via Analogiae*):** Give a strict structural ratio ("A is to B in this new domain as C is to D in a familiar domain").
3. **Climb (*Via Eminentiae*):** Walk the audience up a concrete ladder of familiar examples of increasing purity until they intuit the limit-case at the top.
— In our words · Source: Handbook of Platonism (Alcinous)
[Use when]Use when pitching a category-breaking paradigm, explaining an abstract architectural primitive, or defining a core value that gets corrupted whenever people reduce it to standard industry buzzwords.
---
[Why it matters]The Primary God is beyond all logical categories—neither genus, species, part, whole, qualified, nor unqualified. Because humans are clogged by sensory images, we reach a notion of him by three paths: geometrical-style Abstraction, proportional Analogy, and step-by-step Ascent to sudden illumination. *(Note: Burges's "equality" is a printer's slip for "quality," as confirmed by the next clause.)*
Having stated what the Primary God does, Alcinous explains why he cannot be defined and how the human mind—which is normally "infected with the suffering from sensation" and drags mental images of size, shape, and color into its thoughts—can nevertheless form a rigorous conception of him. Definition requires placing a thing inside a higher *genus* and dividing it by a *difference* (Card 03). Because nothing is prior to the First Principle, he is neither genus, species, nor difference; he is not even "good" by participating in a higher goodness, nor "qualified" (which would make him a composite perfected by an added quality), nor "unqualified" (which implies privation, like Matter). Nor is he a whole made of parts, since parts are prior to the whole they compose.
To grasp this utterly simple, bodiless principle, Alcinous codifies the classic **Three Ways** of Middle Platonic epistemology:
1. **Abstraction (*aphairesis*):** Stripping away all predicates step by step, just as a geometer strips depth from a solid to think a plane, width from a plane to think a line, and length from a line to think an indivisible point.
2. **Analogy (*analogia*):** Mapping the proportion: as the physical Sun stands to sight and visible objects, so the Primary Mind stands to intellect and intelligible objects.
3. **Eminent Ascent (*huperoche*):** Climbing the rungs of beauty from bodies to souls, customs, laws, and sciences until the First Good shines out like a sudden light upon the soul.
**[INTERPRETATION: PRISCA THEOLOGIA / ESOTERIC]**
This single passage in Alcinous is the structural fountainhead of Western apophatic mysticism. Passed through Plotinus, Proclus, and Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite into the medieval Latin church and reclaimed in the Greek original by Ficino, Alcinous’s triad became the Scholastic *via negationis* (Way of Negation/Abstraction), *via analogiae* (Way of Analogy), and *via eminentiae* (Way of Eminence/Ascent). In his footnotes, Burges (1854) highlights Ficino’s vivid rendering of the climax of the third path: *"velut splendorem in animam, quae illuc evolavit, subito refulgentem"* ("like a splendor suddenly flashing out upon the soul that has flown up thither"). For the Renaissance esotericist, the geometrical stripping of solid $\rightarrow$ plane $\rightarrow$ line $\rightarrow$ point is a meditative ritual of de-corporalization. When the mind strips away the last dimensional coordinate, it hits the "indivisible point" of the spirit, where negative theology suddenly flips into positive ecstatic vision—the sudden flash (*subito refulgentem*) of the super-essential Light.