“Also the expression, ‘Every reason has a corresponding reason,’ &c., does in the same manner indicate the suspension of the judgment; for if, while the facts are different, the expressions are equipollent, it follows that a man must be quite ignorant of the real truth. Besides this, to this assertion there is a contrary assertion opposed, which, after having destroyed all others, turns itself against itself, and destroys itself, resembling, as it were, those cathartic medicines which, after they have cleansed the stomach, then discharge themselves, and are got rid of. ... Lastly, the Sceptics say, that the chief good is the suspension of the judgment which tranquillity of mind follows, like its shadow, as Timon and Ænesidemus say; for that we need not choose these things, or avoid those, which all depend on ourselves...” — Diogenes Laertius, *Lives of Eminent Philosophers*, Book IX, *Life of Pyrrho*, VIII, XI (trans. C. D. Yonge, 1853) **Surface Gloss:** Sceptics balance every dogmatic claim with an equally strong counter-claim to trigger suspension of judgment (*epoche*); their own sceptical maxim then flushes itself out like a laxative, and mental tranquillity (*ataraxia*) follows suspension automatically like a shadow. **The Cathartic Argument & Shadow-Goal**: Never argue against a bad theory by installing a rival theory that you now have to defend forever. Use a **Cathartic Counter-Model**: build an equally plausible opposite case solely to deadlock premature certainty, and once the deadlock breaks the room's dogmatism, throw your counter-model away too. Don't chase calm directly; stop forcing conclusions on unprovable variables, and calm will trail behind like a shadow.
— In our words · Source: Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Diogenes Laertius)