They say that the first inclination which an animal has is to protect itself, as nature brings herself to take an interest in it from the beginning, as Chrysippus affirms in the first book of his treatise on Ends; where he says, that the first and dearest object to every animal is its own existence, and its consciousness of that existence. For that it is not natural for any animal to be alienated from itself, or even to be brought into such a state as to be indifferent to itself, being neither alienated from nor interested in itself. It remains, therefore, that we must assert that nature has bound the animal to itself by the greatest unanimity and affection; for by that means it repels all that is injurious, and attracts all that is akin to it and desirable. But as for what some people say, that the first inclination of animals is to pleasure, they say what is false. For they say that pleasure, if there be any such thing at all, is an accessory only, which, nature, having sought it out by itself, as well as those things which are adapted to its constitution, receives incidentally in the same manner as animals are pleased, and plants made to flourish. — Diogenes Laertius, *Lives*, VII.52 (tr. C. D. Yonge, 1853) **Surface Gloss:** Against the Epicureans, the Stoics argue that a creature's primary drive is not pleasure, but self-preservation and self-awareness (*oikeiosis*); pleasure is merely an incidental byproduct that appears when an organism thrives according to its constitution. Never optimize a system, career, or life for **pleasure/metrics (the bloom)**; optimize for **constitutional integrity (the root)**. Ask of any habit, tool, or environment: *"Does this belong to my constitution and strengthen my core agency, or does it alienate me from myself?"* Treat happiness, applause, and pleasure strictly as dashboard indicator lights that blink on incidentally when an organism is doing what it was built to do.
— In our words · Source: Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Diogenes Laertius)