Idea Ripper // ArchiveCards: 1555 [Live] | Updated: 2026-10-14
Card #c162IR // #c162Synthesis

We do not use any kind of “conspiracy” hypothesis to explain massmedia performance. In fact, our treatment is much closer to a “free market” analysis, with the results largely an outcome of the workings of market forces. Most biased choices in the media arise from the preselection of right-thinking people, internalized preconceptions, and the adaptation of personnel to the constraints of ownership, organization, market, and political power. Censorship is largely self-censorship, by reporters and commentators who adjust to the realities of source and media organizational requirements.

— In our words · Source: Manufacturing Consent (Noam Chomsky & Edward S. Herman)

[Use when]

When the model gets dismissed as a conspiracy theory.

[Why it matters]

The authors' preemptive defense: this is market analysis, not conspiracy — bias comes from hiring, habit, and self-censorship.

More from Manufacturing Consent

#c149The essential ingredients of our propaganda model, or set of news “filters,” fall under the following headings: (1) the size, concentrated…When someone asks how propaganda works in a country with no censorship. #c150The elite domination of the media and marginalization of dissidents that results from the operation of these filters occurs so naturally…When “but reporters mean well” is used to dismiss media critique. #c151Ben Bagdikian stresses the fact that despite the large media numbers, the twenty-nine largest media systems account for over half of the…When the sheer number of outlets is offered as proof of press freedom.